Monday, October 3, 2011


I think the best way to addressing the stereotype that men are funnier than women would be to first look at how humor is perceived and what traits may be associated with having a good sense of humor. Greengross and Miller found in their study that humor is found to be sexually attractive. Miller and Greengross believe that intelligence should be a good predictor of humor which in turn should predict how successful someone is with a member of the opposite sex, or “mating success” as it’s defined in the article. In this experiment, 400 college students of which half were male and half female took various tasks to determine the correlation between humor, intelligence and mating success. To measure intelligence, participants were tested on their verbal vocabulary skills. Next to determine mating success, these participants were rated on the answer they provided to the Sexual Behaviors and Beliefs Questionnaire. Finally, participants were measured on humor producing ability where they were asked to make up captions for cartoons. According to this study, men rated higher in all three categories than women. 

I personally think there are a few problems with this article. For starters, a person’s “mating success” is based on how many sexual partners you have in a life time. I think this is the opposite of success in terms of mating. I think the more sexual partners you have means the less stable relationships you’re in. Also, both the authors and conductors of this research are men. This could be a potential bias, especially if they knew exactly who wrote what captions for what cartoon. Even if that information was kept confidential, it is a very real possibility that they thought the nature of the captions was funnier than those of the women’s. Men aren’t necessarily funnier than women, however, men and women do have different views and opinions of what is funny and what is not. I would be interested in this study done with maybe an additional two female researchers also scoring the cartoon captions as well as replacing the defined definition of “successful mating” with something a little more solid such as overall agreeableness or how well the participant typically gets along with others. I think it is fair to say that having a good sense of humor can be a good predictor of certain types of intelligence; however intelligence isn’t necessarily a solid predictor of humor. I would also be interested in seeing how other measures of intelligence compare to students senses of humor. This study focused solely on verbal intelligence which tested students on vocabulary words. I would be curious to see if the same results were obtained if they just compared GPAs.

References:
Greengross, G., & Miller, G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Journal of Intelligence, 39(39), 188-192

2 comments:

  1. I'm glad you recognized the biases in the research you found on your topic. Although it does seem like an interesting study, the problems you mention seem spot on. It is interesting that the researchers see mating success as having many partners. Do you think our culture and society would view mating success the same way or do you think less partners but longer relationships deem success?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sophie- I'm glad you pointed out the biases in the research because as I was reading, I was thinking the exact same things. I completely agree with you that the number of sexual partners should not indicate mating success. Having more sexual partners may be because of a variety of reasons (failure to commit, getting involved in unstable relationships etc). I don't think intelligence has that strong a connection to someone being humorous. I think the researchers could have done a much better job in their study.

    ReplyDelete